LNG industry gathers in Athens to discuss commodity challenges, solutions

Banner Image

The message from LNG industry leaders gathered at the annual World LNG Summit & Awards wavered between wariness and optimism Nov. 30 as they discussed changes in contracting, the unprecedented challenges facing the industry and a new pricing mechanism for hedging Atlantic cargoes.

Politicians, administrators and trading managers recapped 2022 across various panels and presentations during the 22nd World LNG Summit & Awards, organized by DMG events and taking place in Athens. They were near universal in noting the unprecedented challenges presented by record-high LNG prices, the war in Ukraine and European energy security.

"Was it a black swan event [in 2022]? No, it was a flock of black swan events, "said Pat Roberts, Managing Director of LNG Worldwide, who described 2022 as one of the most tumultuous years for the LNG industry.

"We clearly have a major crisis as an industry," said Steve Hill, Shell's Executive Vice President for energy marketing.

Discussed across several panels were how the war and other factors have caused record high natural gas and LNG prices and an unprecedented decoupling between the Dutch TTF natural gas hub and the Northwest European LNG price. Platts assessed Northwest Europe LNG at a record high of $74.486/MMBtu on Aug. 26 alongside a similarly bullish TTF second-month price of $98.96/MMBtu. On Oct. 3, the difference between the two markets reached a record spread when LNG fell to a $29.55/MMBtu discount to TTF.

While many panelists were candid in the challenges facing the LNG market, there was also praise for the speed in which Germany has brought import capacity online as well as other market solutions put forward.

"This crisis has revealed there are diverse European indexes and, of course, they have reacted differently," said Patrick Dugas, Vice President LNG Trading in TOTAL Gas & Power Limited (TGP) and Global Head of LNG Trading. "We realized we have been misled in that pipeline gas no more reflects the price of an LNG Cargo."

"We will have to find a way to move away from the pipeline gas TTF index to a Northwest Europe LNG index."

The LNG North West Europe Marker (Platts) Futures Contract was launched by the CME on Oct. 24 and traded on opening day. The contract is cash settled against the Platts DES Northwest Europe physical assessments, has a size of 10,000 MMBtu and monthly contracts are listed for the current year and the next five calendar years.

"We have an LNG marker that we hope will move to gather the liquidity and activity of the LNG players in Europe," Dugas said. "This is an index that reflects the market in Northwest Europe."

Panelists were mixed on the viability of short versus long-term LNG contracting, with spot activity strained during high price environments. Hill said the combination of long-term and spot contracting is unconventional but works for LNG. Jonathan Westby, Jera Senior Vice President LNG said his company relies on the spot market to manage their business. ADNOC LNG's Senior Vice President of commercial Rashid Al Mazrouei said a shift to long term contracts are needed to secure countries' energy supplies and ensure capital commitments for long term liquefaction projects.

Tags

  • LNG

  • Gas & Power

Related content

News

Interactive: European LNG imports tracker

The sharp fall in Russian pipeline gas supplies to Europe through 2022 and the EU’s decision to diversify its gas imports away from Russia has prompted a major increase in European LNG imports and a large-scale expansion of LNG regasification capacity. The EU, UK and Turkey saw a combined 60% year-on-year increase in imports in 2022 and intake kept pace in 2023, with some 125.5 million mt (173 Bcm) of LNG delivered last year, marginally lower than the 127.6 million mt in 2022, S&P Global Commodity Insights data showed. The expansion of Europe’s import capacity is also set to continue, with more floating capacity additions expected in Germany in 2024 and Greece having taken the first LNG into its new Alexandroupolis FSRU in February. While US dominance over European LNG imports endures, Russia and Qatar are both still key supply sources, and Algerian LNG exports to Europe rose by some 22% year-on-year in 2023.

News

After two years of war, Europe emerging from shadow of Russian gas

Two years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- helping to trigger arguably the most serious gas crisis in Europe’s history -- market dynamics are much changed, with supply sources and routes majorly altered. With the majority of Russian pipeline deliveries halted, only a handful of countries still import piped gas from Russia’s Gazprom, among them Austria, Slovakia, Hungary and non-EU Serbia. And although Russian LNG supplies to Europe remain relatively robust, they still account for only a small share of Europe’s overall gas imports. Now, with the EU giving member states the right to restrict Russian imports at the national level and Austria looking to speed up an exit from Russian gas, the remaining Russian volumes in Europe face an uncertain future. The EU has already seen its Russian gas and LNG imports plummet, falling from 155 Bcm in 2021 to 80 Bcm in 2022 and to 43 Bcm last year, according to European Commission data. In its place, Europe is importing significantly more LNG, while traditional pipeline suppliers -- such as Norway, Algeria and Azerbaijan -- are doing their best to maintain high levels of exports. Norway’s pipeline exports to Europe hit a new record monthly high in December last year. EC efforts The EU’s energy commissioner Kadri Simson acknowledged Feb. 15 that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had created the worst energy crisis “in decades” for the EU. “But two years later, we can say that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s attempt to divide and blackmail us on energy has failed,” Simson said. The EC claims much of the success in responding to Russia’s weaponization of energy, upping its diplomatic efforts to secure alternative supplies, introducing mandatory storage filling and encouraging 15% demand reductions. In reality, market signals and the weather played as big a part in ensuring supply was able to meet demand through 2022, 2023 and into 2024. Related feature: Russia defiant two years into war reshaping global energy Prices rose sufficiently high through 2022 -- hitting new record levels in August that year -- to price out some demand, to attract increased LNG cargoes and to incentivize maxed out Norwegian supply. Mild winters in both 2022/23 and 2023/24 also meant gas stocks remained at historically high levels, keeping a lid on prices. On Feb. 23, Platts -- part of S&P Global Commodity Insights -- assessed the TTF front-month price at just Eur23.30/MWh, a far cry from its record high of almost Eur320/MWh in August 2022. But analysts are still cautious. “Two years on from the Russian invasion and benchmark prices are back to ‘normal’ levels. But we have not reached a new steady state,” according to Michael Stoppard, global Gas Strategy lead at S&P Global Commodity Insights. “While higher LNG imports from the US and elsewhere have covered for almost half of lost Russian pipeline gas, a bigger factor is sharply lower European demand,” Stoppard said. “Some gas demand has gone forever through factory closures or more efficient processes, but most will return. The market may be under-estimating how much demand will come back,” he said. Russian future Question marks also remain about whether Russian gas could regain its lost market share at some point in the future. Gas analyst Jonathan Stern from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies is doubtful. “The era of 30+% share of Russian gas is over and will not return, whatever the outcome of the war and whoever presides in the Kremlin,” Stern said. “Individual countries may continue to import gas from Russia, but Europe’s gas and energy map has changed fundamentally,” he said. Stern added that the major unresolved gas question concerned the remaining long-term Russian gas contracts with European buyers. These, he said, “cannot be wished away by politicians” and remain a legal and contractual “elephant in the room”. European gas traders, meanwhile, see consumption trends as key to the future of Russian gas in Europe. “It’s all about the demand -- if gas demand destruction continues we can avoid Russian gas,” a Switzerland-based trader said. A Netherlands-based trader said that with industrial demand being particularly price-sensitive, the loss of “cheap” Russian pipeline gas would continue to impact consumption. “The bottom line is that the need for gas comes from the price we get it at,” the trader said. Alternative options Russia itself has limited options for diverting its gas, with the majority of the volumes that used to be piped to Europe now thought to be shut in. Currently Russian pipeline gas to Europe is restricted to flows entering Ukraine at the Sudzha interconnection point and deliveries via the European string of TurkStream. A total of around 80 million cu m/d currently flows into Europe by pipeline, but half of this could be lost when Russia and Ukraine’s transit deal expires at the end of 2024. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said in January that Russia was ready to continue supplying gas to Europe via any available route, including through Ukraine. But, he said, Moscow had yet to see any desire from its counterparties for talks on the issue, while Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out engaging with Russia on talks over transit. Putin also repeated his claim in his interview with Tucker Carlson earlier this month that Russia was still ready to supply gas to Europe via the undamaged Nord Stream 2 string. However, the pipeline operator was never certified by the German authorities and so the line cannot flow gas. In the meantime, Gazprom is looking to raise exports to China and planning to lock in long-term supply deals with its Central Asian neighbors, such as Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. But these supplies would not be able to offset the lost European deliveries. And what seems certain in Europe is that -- at least at the political level -- there is very little desire to see Russian gas come back in any significant way to the market.

News

Shell flags weak Q4 refining ahead of Singapore selloff

Sees $2.5 bil-$4.5 bil impairment amid weak margins Throughput impacted by North America maintenance Upstream output set to steady in Q4 Shell on Jan. 8 highlighted a weak fourth quarter for its refining and chemicals unit due to lower margins and a maintenance impact on throughput, as it warned investors of an expected financial impairment of $2.5 billion-$4.5 billion, primarily in the downstream. Shell said in December it plans to offload its 500,000 b/d Singapore refining and chemicals operations due to a lack of advantage in feedstock, energy and utility costs, starkly contrasting with the company's earlier enthusiasm for opportunities in Asia in the previous decade. Shell's global indicative refining margin dropped from $15.72/b in Q3 2023 to $10/b in Q4, and it said it expected significantly lower results from chemicals and products trading compared with Q3, with the chemicals and products unit set for an adjusted earnings loss. Results were also affected by a slump in refinery throughput to a range of 78%-82%, a level reminiscent of the pandemic, but due to planned maintenance at its North American refining operations. Shell's North American downstream business is spread across two sites in Canada and one in the US: the 100,000 b/d Scotford refinery in Alberta, which processes synthetic crude derived from oil sands, and the 85,000 b/d Sarnia refinery near Ontario, as well as the 250,000 b/d Norco refinery in Louisiana. Scotford was expected to operate at reduced levels during maintenance in October, while Norco was expected to be under maintenance for most of that month, S&P Global Commodity Insights reported earlier. Steadier upstream Elsewhere in its business, there were some signs of more stable upstream production, with the midpoint of Shell's guidance for the upstream unit higher than output in Q4 2022. It forecast production in a range of 1.83 million-1.93 million b/d of oil equivalent, offset by a potential fall in production in the LNG-focused Integrated Gas unit, to 880,000-920,000 boe/d. Shell's oil output declined significantly between 2019 and 2022, and particularly during 2022. Shell confirmed its earlier guidance that LNG liquefaction volumes for Q4 2023 were higher than a year earlier, in a range of 6.9 million-7.3 million mt, although that is also significantly below pre-2022 levels. It added that financial results from LNG trading were expected to be "significantly higher" than in Q3 2023 due to "seasonality and increased optimization opportunities." The Platts Dated Brent benchmark was assessed $4.53/b lower on average in Q4 2023 compared with a year earlier at $84.34/b. Platts is part of S&P Global Commodity Insights.

News

Global gas market's trauma in the rearview mirror

Gas and LNG markets are showing signs of emerging from the trauma they endured since early-2022. Trade activity, futures volumes, price levels and volatility are all moving in a positive direction. While risks remain for this winter and next year, an outlook that looked tight for many years to come has softened, thanks to supply-side investments and prudence among consuming nations. Comparing the volatility of gas and LNG benchmarks with that of oil highlights how turbulent things have been for the former. Volatility really started to pick up in 2021, when the 30-day moving annualized volatility averaged more than 100% for both Platts JKM, the global benchmark reflecting Northeast Asia LNG cargoes, and Dutch TTF, the largest European gas hub. It escalated further in 2022, reaching levels across the entire year of 175% for NBP and more than 100% for JKM and TTF. The consequences of these volatility levels were significant. They triggered raising of margin requirements at clearing houses to levels that approached the entire value of the derivative contract – this was five to six times the norm. As a result, activity either dried up or moved over-the-counter, where companies were often more willing to have less stringent margin requirements. Market transparency took a hit. It also caused difficulties for risk management of cargoes, crimping some companies' ability to trade. The margin calls on future positions for some entities ran into billions of dollars, further occupying time and capital. The outright price of LNG cargoes, which on one day in August reached close to $300 million per cargo, also dampened many market participants' activities. Companies were therefore faced with an evaporated liquidity pool, fewer potential counterparties, huge cash calls and – toward the end of the year – surging governmental intervention in markets. From European gas and power to South Korean power and Australian gas, previously hands-off policymakers were starting to impose long-lasting and far-reaching changes to utility markets. The industry entered 2023 bruised – and most expectations were for an equally bruising year ahead. Download the latest Commodity Insights Magazine . Features include: * Financing the energy transition * Oversupply weighs on global petrochemicals * Global gas market's trauma In November 2022, S&P Global Commodity Insights' forecast for JKM suggested the benchmark would remain between $33 and $34/MMBtu on average in 2023-2024, more or less where the benchmark averaged in 2022. As of October 2023, S&P Global's forecast for this two-year period has changed to an average of $14-$15/MMBtu, before dropping close to $10/MMBtu in 2027. The recalibration is understandable as the demand-side reaction has been impressive, with consistently lower gas demand in Europe and greater generating fuel optionality in major consuming markets like China, while supply will be stoked by significant incoming volumes from North America and the Middle East in the coming years. The effects of greater balance are being felt in reduced market volatility. JKM, for instance, has seen volatility more than halve in the first nine months of 2023 versus 2022. While European gas hubs NBP and TTF continued to show high levels of volatility, they are also lower than a year prior. Due to exchanges using a long-dated scanning period for margins, this reduced volatility is yet to be fully felt in margin requirements, which remain higher than historical norms. Volumes are starting to recover, though, with around 14.5 million mt of JKM derivatives being traded in October, the highest level since January 2022. Absolute price levels, while historically still elevated, are more manageable at about $60 million per cargo. More market participants have therefore been able to hedge and trade LNG cargoes. The amount of times a cargo changes hands before it arrives at its destination has thereby increased. After cratering in 2022 and remaining slow into early-2023, trade has started to pick up, with more competition between the Atlantic and Pacific basins for flexible LNG allowing for greater divergence of views around pricing. The increase in trade activity is most easily visible in the Platts LNG Market on Close (MOC) assessment process, our most transparent window into the market. July-September became the quarter with the highest reported trades in the MOC since late-2021, while October was a record month for reported trades, with nearly 1 million mt of physical trades reported in the process. There were 180 full cargoes bid and offered during October, also the highest on record. While the market is undoubtedly healthier by all these measures, the painful experience of 2022 has yet to be forgotten. At the Singapore International Energy Week conference in October, the audience was polled on where they see JKM reaching by end-2023. Despite the forward curve hovering around $17-$18/MMBtu at the time, 40% of the respondents believed JKM would settle somewhere between $20 and $30/MMBtu by year-end. Market participants still harbor upside fear: it will take time for nerves to calm and memories to muddy. This article first appeared in the December edition of Commodity Insights Magazine .