Freeport LNG delays restart target to end of year amid US regulatory hurdles

Banner Image

Freeport LNG delayed its restart target until the end of the year, about two weeks beyond its previous estimate, as it works with US regulators to secure all approvals necessary to resume production, the operator said Dec. 1.

The three-train, 15 million mt/year capacity terminal in Texas, which serves about 15% of US liquefaction output, has been offline since a June explosion and fire. The operator estimated Nov. 18 that it would resume production in mid-December, which represented a delay of about a month from its previous target.

The latest timeline reflects some progress on the regulatory front, although work continues to secure all necessary clearances.

Freeport LNG has approval from agencies to complete critical repairs and commence reinstatement of certain systems, spokeswoman Heather Browne told S&P Global Commodity Insights in response to questions.

Based upon current progress and subject to the operator continuing to meet necessary requirements, Freeport LNG now anticipates that "restart of liquefaction to be achieved around year-end," Browne said.

Freeport LNG has long-term offtake deals with South Korea's SK E&S, Japanese utilities JERA, and Osaka Gas, as well as French energy major TotalEnergies. Some counterparties have had to rely more heavily on the spot market for LNG supplies during the outage.

Freeport LNG has said its three liquefaction trains will be restarted and ramped up in a slow and deliberate manner, with each train starting separately before restarting a subsequent train. It previously said it expected that about 2 Bcf/d of production would be achieved in January. The terminal's capacity is around 2.3 Bcf/d. Full production utilizing both docks remains anticipated to be achieved in March, Freeport LNG said.

Investigators with the US Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration have been present at the site throughout the course of the probe and planned to be there to consider restart approval, said a person familiar with the situation.

Tags

  • LNG

  • Gas & Power

Related content

News

S&P Global Commodity Insights Weekly ET News Highlights – Apr 2, 2024

Japan's largest power producer tests ammonia as new fuel Energy transition highlights: Our editors and analysts bring together everything you need to know about the industry this week, from renewables to storage to carbon prices. JERA -- Japan's largest power generation company and one of the world’s largest power utilities --started testing ammonia cofiring at one of its largest thermal power plants this week. The project paves the way for the use of ammonia in the power sector on a commercial scale that has never been done before. Currently, ammonia is a largely a feedstock for fertilizer production with some of it going into chemicals. However, ammonia can be combusted with zero carbon emissions and it is one of the pathways being explored for the transportation of hydrogen as it has existing trade flows that can be expanded. These factors allow ammonia to become as an energy transition fuel. JERA started testing ammonia cofiring at its 1 GW No. 4 coal-fired unit at Hekinan thermal power plant in central Japan from April 1, to be carried out through June using about 40,000 mt of ammonia. The 20% cofiring of ammonia is expected to be the world's first at a large commercial coal-fired power plant and is part of a four-year long pilot project. JERA has pledged to commercialize its ammonia cofiring power generation by 2030 and use 100% ammonia as fuel in the 2040s for its 2050 carbon neutrality target. Japan sees great potential in ammonia as a CO2 zero-emission fuel as the country targets to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 46% by FY 2030-31 from FY 2013-14 levels and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 . Price of the week: Meanwhile, the price of emission allowances in China’s national compliance carbon market hit a new record on March 29 of Yuan 90.66/mtCO2e ($12.78/mtCO2e), increasing 8.1% week on week, according to Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange. The steady increase in Chinese carbon prices has been attributed to bullish sentiment and looming deadlines for meeting emissions obligations. Editor’s pick: Premium and free content SPGlobal.com Germany’s SHS launches green hydrogen tender for Saarland steel plants German steel producer Stahl-Holding-Saar has launched a tender to buy up to 50,000 mt of locally produced renewable hydrogen for its Dillinger and Saarstahl plants in Saarland, the company said March 26. SHS and its subsidiaries are due to produce up to 3.5 million mt/year of green steel from 2027/28. The move follows a tender from Thyssenkrupp for large volumes of clean hydrogen for its Duisburg plant in Germany from 2028. Platts Connect New open-source tool aims to inform on environmental impact of hydrogen The Open Hydrogen Initiative released March 25 an open-source tool for determining the carbon intensity of hydrogen as some industry members work to harmonize measurement methodologies. This new tool allows for the calculation of the carbon intensity of hydrogen production at the facility level based on the operational parameters of the facility and its supply chains, “capturing the nuances” of a project’s emissions, OHI Executive Director Zane McDonald Manchin, oil and gas groups urge flexibility, better coordination on methane fee Delays in implementing a fee on oil and gas system methane emissions and new greenhouse gas reporting rules are unfair to regulated companies and run counter to congressional intent, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Joe Manchin, Democrat-West Virginia, told the Environmental Protection Agency March 26. TES gets tariff, third-party exemption for German LNG, e-natural gas terminal Tree Energy Solutions has secured an exemption from tariff and third-party access regulation for its planned “e-LNG” import terminal at the Green Energy Hub in Wilhelmshaven from the German network regulator BNetzA. BNetzA has exempted the 15-Bcm/year terminal, which will import LNG before switching to green hydrogen-based “electric natural gas” (e-NG), for 20 years from the start of the operations.

News

Infographic: Bearish Q2 signals hold sway for European gas, power markets

Europe is entering its "gas summer" with prices back at what could be considered normal levels and with gas storage stocks in robust health. Another mild winter and weak demand have left the EU's gas storage sites filled to 59% of capacity, while demand in the EU and UK is set for a 3.7% year-on-year decline in Q2 2024, according to forecasts from S&P Global Commodity Insights. Meanwhile, electricity demand across ten core markets is forecast to rise 1.7% with Europe's power markets entering spring in the best supply shape since 2020. Solar output is forecast to exceed gas-fired power generation for the first time in Q2. Carbon prices are expected to show more resilience finding stability just above Eur60/mtCO2e after EU Allowances fell close to three-year lows. The European Commission is expected to release 2023 EU ETS verified emissions data on April 3 with S&P Global analysts forecasting a drop of 11% year-on-year. Read the full feature: Bearish Q2 signals hold sway for European gas, power markets (subscriber content) Click here to see the full-size infographic

News

Interactive: European LNG imports tracker

The sharp fall in Russian pipeline gas supplies to Europe through 2022 and the EU’s decision to diversify its gas imports away from Russia has prompted a major increase in European LNG imports and a large-scale expansion of LNG regasification capacity. The EU, UK and Turkey saw a combined 60% year-on-year increase in imports in 2022 and intake kept pace in 2023, with some 125.5 million mt (173 Bcm) of LNG delivered last year, marginally lower than the 127.6 million mt in 2022, S&P Global Commodity Insights data showed. The expansion of Europe’s import capacity is also set to continue, with more floating capacity additions expected in Germany in 2024 and Greece having taken the first LNG into its new Alexandroupolis FSRU in February. While US dominance over European LNG imports endures, Russia and Qatar are both still key supply sources, and Algerian LNG exports to Europe rose by some 22% year-on-year in 2023.

News

After two years of war, Europe emerging from shadow of Russian gas

Two years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- helping to trigger arguably the most serious gas crisis in Europe’s history -- market dynamics are much changed, with supply sources and routes majorly altered. With the majority of Russian pipeline deliveries halted, only a handful of countries still import piped gas from Russia’s Gazprom, among them Austria, Slovakia, Hungary and non-EU Serbia. And although Russian LNG supplies to Europe remain relatively robust, they still account for only a small share of Europe’s overall gas imports. Now, with the EU giving member states the right to restrict Russian imports at the national level and Austria looking to speed up an exit from Russian gas, the remaining Russian volumes in Europe face an uncertain future. The EU has already seen its Russian gas and LNG imports plummet, falling from 155 Bcm in 2021 to 80 Bcm in 2022 and to 43 Bcm last year, according to European Commission data. In its place, Europe is importing significantly more LNG, while traditional pipeline suppliers -- such as Norway, Algeria and Azerbaijan -- are doing their best to maintain high levels of exports. Norway’s pipeline exports to Europe hit a new record monthly high in December last year. EC efforts The EU’s energy commissioner Kadri Simson acknowledged Feb. 15 that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had created the worst energy crisis “in decades” for the EU. “But two years later, we can say that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s attempt to divide and blackmail us on energy has failed,” Simson said. The EC claims much of the success in responding to Russia’s weaponization of energy, upping its diplomatic efforts to secure alternative supplies, introducing mandatory storage filling and encouraging 15% demand reductions. In reality, market signals and the weather played as big a part in ensuring supply was able to meet demand through 2022, 2023 and into 2024. Related feature: Russia defiant two years into war reshaping global energy Prices rose sufficiently high through 2022 -- hitting new record levels in August that year -- to price out some demand, to attract increased LNG cargoes and to incentivize maxed out Norwegian supply. Mild winters in both 2022/23 and 2023/24 also meant gas stocks remained at historically high levels, keeping a lid on prices. On Feb. 23, Platts -- part of S&P Global Commodity Insights -- assessed the TTF front-month price at just Eur23.30/MWh, a far cry from its record high of almost Eur320/MWh in August 2022. But analysts are still cautious. “Two years on from the Russian invasion and benchmark prices are back to ‘normal’ levels. But we have not reached a new steady state,” according to Michael Stoppard, global Gas Strategy lead at S&P Global Commodity Insights. “While higher LNG imports from the US and elsewhere have covered for almost half of lost Russian pipeline gas, a bigger factor is sharply lower European demand,” Stoppard said. “Some gas demand has gone forever through factory closures or more efficient processes, but most will return. The market may be under-estimating how much demand will come back,” he said. Russian future Question marks also remain about whether Russian gas could regain its lost market share at some point in the future. Gas analyst Jonathan Stern from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies is doubtful. “The era of 30+% share of Russian gas is over and will not return, whatever the outcome of the war and whoever presides in the Kremlin,” Stern said. “Individual countries may continue to import gas from Russia, but Europe’s gas and energy map has changed fundamentally,” he said. Stern added that the major unresolved gas question concerned the remaining long-term Russian gas contracts with European buyers. These, he said, “cannot be wished away by politicians” and remain a legal and contractual “elephant in the room”. European gas traders, meanwhile, see consumption trends as key to the future of Russian gas in Europe. “It’s all about the demand -- if gas demand destruction continues we can avoid Russian gas,” a Switzerland-based trader said. A Netherlands-based trader said that with industrial demand being particularly price-sensitive, the loss of “cheap” Russian pipeline gas would continue to impact consumption. “The bottom line is that the need for gas comes from the price we get it at,” the trader said. Alternative options Russia itself has limited options for diverting its gas, with the majority of the volumes that used to be piped to Europe now thought to be shut in. Currently Russian pipeline gas to Europe is restricted to flows entering Ukraine at the Sudzha interconnection point and deliveries via the European string of TurkStream. A total of around 80 million cu m/d currently flows into Europe by pipeline, but half of this could be lost when Russia and Ukraine’s transit deal expires at the end of 2024. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said in January that Russia was ready to continue supplying gas to Europe via any available route, including through Ukraine. But, he said, Moscow had yet to see any desire from its counterparties for talks on the issue, while Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out engaging with Russia on talks over transit. Putin also repeated his claim in his interview with Tucker Carlson earlier this month that Russia was still ready to supply gas to Europe via the undamaged Nord Stream 2 string. However, the pipeline operator was never certified by the German authorities and so the line cannot flow gas. In the meantime, Gazprom is looking to raise exports to China and planning to lock in long-term supply deals with its Central Asian neighbors, such as Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. But these supplies would not be able to offset the lost European deliveries. And what seems certain in Europe is that -- at least at the political level -- there is very little desire to see Russian gas come back in any significant way to the market.