CONTAINER PREMIUMS: Rates strengthen to US East Coast as shippers seek to avoid US West Coast

Banner Image
Some further strengthening was seen over the course of the week for trans-Pacific premiums as many US-based importers continued booking cargoes to the US East Coast, rather than face the uncertainty of labor negotiations on the US West Coast.This has only served to fuel a currently worsening situation on the East Coast, with higher booking rates coming hand in hand with the unrelenting congestion at key USEC ports, headlined by Charleston with some 30 vessels waiting to birth.This is a situation likely to get worse in the short term as more booked cargoes begin to arrive, adding fuel to fire."The premium market is starting to pick up again, especially given the diversification away from the US West Coast at this point," said a US-based logistics provider. "The queues at US East Coast ports are starting to mount so it's becoming quite tricky to move goods."Rates to the US West Coast for premium bookings were heard as high as $16,000/FEU, while the US East Coast still maintained a premium. Rates were heard for spot bookings as high as $17,500/FEU, not far off the peak seen towards the end of 2021, when rates were resting in the $20,000/FEU range.As with other regions, the real issues in the market remain not with the ocean freight element, but with the inland logistics shortage. A lack of chassis and railcars are precluding importers to move their goods away from ports and towards inland distribution networks.Premium rates weren't only seen on the trans-Pacific however. The worsening situation at European ports with delayed cargoes has prompted some premiums to continue and even grow on trans-Atlantic routes."There are big delays in Europe at the moment so we are starting to see some premiums begin to come back for trans-Pacific," said a US-based freight forwarder. "Not big levels, but people paying up to move goods quickly otherwise they'll end up at the bottom of a growing stack."These premiums were heard in the $8,500/FEU region for North Europe-to-East Coast North America cargoes.

Southeast Asia market eyes port disruptions

The all-inclusive premium container rates were largely stable during the week ended March 25 as concerns of port disruptions, blank sailings and higher bunker fuel charges were partially offset by slower cargo movement in China, sources said.The average freight for Southeast Asia to North America was heard at $17,000-$18,000/FEU for East Coast and $15,000-$16,000/FEU for West Coast, unchanged from a week ago but some quotes were offered with steep monthly increases, sources said."I received a quote from NVOCC for Philippines to Ohio at $22,500/FEU. Last month, it was at $20,826/FEU," a US-based importer said.The current geopolitical circumstances further pose a threat to market stability and may lead to higher rates, the importer added."While major ports in South China have resumed operations, the shortage of truckers is a looming concern as the various tests and checks may deter them from coming to Shenzhen to pick up containers," a source based in Singapore said. "Shortage of truckers would again result in a shortage of empty boxes."The trucking service between Shenzhen and nearby cities may be impacted by 20% due to stricter road control and frequent Nucleic Acid Test, Danish carrier Maersk said earlier this week. "Consequently, there will be longer delivery times and a possible rise in transport costs such as detour fee and highway fee."Despite the terminals being operational, several carriers have been blanking sailings at major ports, leading to concerns of cargo backlog and long queues at ports, sources said.The FAK rates on the route, however, remained stable during the week.Platts Container Rate 25 -- Southeast Asia-to-East Coast North America -- was assessed at $10,500/FEU and PCR23 -- Southeast Asia-to-West Coast North America -- was assessed at $9,500/FEU March 25, both unchanged on the week.Prices on the short-haul India-Middle East route were assessed higher this week due to rising bunker fuel costs and growing uncertainty in the supply chain.PCR33 -- West Coast India to the Middle East -- was assessed at $2,300 FEU March 25, up $200 on the week. TCR33 -- West Coast India to the Middle East – was assessed at $1,050/TEU, against $1,000/TEU in the previous week."Prices have been fluctuating around different routes. For India to the Middle East they are gradually moving up as more and more BAF adjustments are being introduced. Just recently, a $300 GRI has been implemented on reefer containers on the route," a freight forwarder based in India said.

Tags

  • Shipping

Related content

News

Infographic: Oil trade adjusts to Red Sea turmoil despite latest attacks

Red Sea shipping volumes have slumped more than 60% since November as vessels opt for the longer Cape route to avoid Houthi attacks. But even as the severity of the attacks mounts, freight rates have retreated from recent highs and oil-on-water may have peaked as trade flows adjust. Click to see the full-size infographic

News

Interactive: Seaborne trade in Russian oil under G7 price cap

Russia, one of the world’s largest oil suppliers, has increasingly turned to non-Western firms to transport its crude to overseas buyers during its ongoing war with Ukraine . With a dual goal of undermining Russia’s war chest without creating significant disruptions to global supplies amid inflation pressure, G7 countries and their allies have banned tanker operators, insurers and other services firms from facilitating seaborne Russian crude exports unless the barrels are sold for no more than $60/b. The price cap regime, which came into force Dec. 5, 2022, does not directly cover tankers flagged, owned and operated by companies outside the G7, the EU, Australia, Switzerland and Norway, and not insured by Western protection and indemnity clubs. While such ships tend to be older and less maintained, their share in Russia’s crude exports market has been rising in recent months amid strengthening prices of Urals -- the OPEC+ member’s flagship crude grade -- and tightening sanctions enforcement by the West. Non-price-capped tankers have a larger market share in shipping Russia’s Pacific crude exports, according to analysis of S&P Global Commodities at Sea and Maritime Intelligence Risk Suite data. Crudes such as Sokol, Sakhalin Blend, and Eastern Siberia–Pacific Ocean grades are more often involved in these trades than Russian barrels from Baltic or Black Sea ports like Urals. Tanker operators in Greece, Europe’s top shipowning nation, managed to keep their traditionally strong market position in Russia in the first few months since the price cap took effect before giving ways to their peers in the UAE, Russia, China and Hong Kong. Related content: Interactive: Global oil flow tracker Greek operators regain share in Russian crude exports despite tighter sanctions

News

Red Sea turmoil has so far spared oil supplies, but buyers have reasons to worry

A series of attacks on shipping routes in the Red Sea has so far spared oil supplies from witnessing major disruptions, but oil importing countries are spending sleepless nights amid concerns that any escalation could potentially alter the situation drastically. Although the attacks disrupted container shipping lines, oil shipments remain largely stable. However, concerns stem from the fact that supply chains will likely have to adjust very quickly should the disruption persist. As existing oil tanker contracts are often hard to change, some ongoing traffic will continue to move through Red Sea passages. Any new insurance issued for Red Sea routes could add about $1/b or more to voyage costs, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights. Re-routing will increase voyage length, in-transit times and fuel costs. In addition, it will result in higher vessel utilizations, which could lift global freight rates as well as widen inter-regional crude spreads. Surely, more ships are avoiding the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab strait after a spate of attacks by Yemen's Houthi militants, threatening the strategic chokepoint for global seaborne trade. Many shippers, tanker owners and some oil companies have suspended voyages through the area. Russia's oil exports are particularly exposed to further Red Sea disruptions as Moscow ships some 80% of its crude to Asian markets. The attacks are expected to keep insurance costs high and prompt many tankers to take the longer route via the Cape of Good Hope, increasing ton miles and voyage durations, as well as tightening supplies and driving up freight rates. Even for the route via the Suez Canal, higher fees effective this year combined with a carbon tax for Europe-bound cargoes, will increase overall costs for charterers. Special report: Taking the long way around: Ships divert from the Panama Canal Although the rerouting of tankers away from the Red Sea, a major conduit for oil loaded in Russia, will surely raise shipping costs, the impact will be transitory. Roughly 7 million-8 million b/d of crude oil and products transited the Red Sea in recent months, according to S&P Global data. The market, for sure, will adjust to the changing flows, but the re-routing will lead to more oil on the water for a longer period of time. Russian crude shipments, should they avoid the Red Sea, are most affected due to a much longer haul to Asia around Africa. And amid tighter fleet capacity, lingering geopolitical conflicts are expected to boost tanker freight in 2024 despite ongoing OPEC+ supply cuts and a possible slowdown in oil demand growth. Implications for Asia As the biggest oil importing region, Asia may not witness dramatic changes to near-term oil supplies amid the ongoing Red Sea crisis, but refiners are chalking out alternative plans to ensure steady feedstock flows in the event of an escalation, a move that could inflate insurance costs and crimp refining margins. Although the region relies on imported oil for the bulk of its needs, the strategic push among Asia's top importers to massively diversify their import baskets over the years, as well as expand strategic storage, will come in handy to ensure smooth and uninterrupted flow of feedstocks. The Red Sea crisis has three aspects to it, as far as Asian oil flows are concerned. First, any escalation will create hurdles for Russian crude flowing to Asia, forcing buyers to look for substitutes from other origins. Secondly, for products moving from Asia to Europe, exporters are cautiously watching developments before taking the plunge. And lastly, longer routes have the potential to create incremental bunker fuel demand in Asia. Oil flows into China have not been impacted much by the Red Sea turbulence, as fewer cargoes are headed there on that route. In addition, the impact on Russian oil flows to India has been minimal, with no major diversions seen so far. Russia contributed over 35% of India's total crude imports in 2023, amounting to 1.7 million b/d, according to S&P Global data. Asian oil buyers are not necessarily concerned about Middle Eastern sour crude supplies for 2024, as major sellers, including Saudi Aramco and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., fully respect Asian customers' demand regardless of their production cut commitments. However, the economics for cracking Middle Eastern sour crude have been deteriorating as the costs of bringing Persian Gulf barrels to the Far East have been rising with shippers demanding risk premiums, while tanker insurance costs are also trending higher. Asian refiners may even look at cutting Middle Eastern term contractual volumes and explore other options like African, US and South American crudes to maximize margins. US crudes, for one, is becoming increasingly more attractive for Asian refiners as the price of lighter and sweeter WTI crude is nearly on par with high-sulfur Persian Gulf grades on a delivered basis. Supply cushion The attacks in the Red Sea continued even after the US-led alliance took military action to establish deterrence. The risk of a wider escalation also increased with Pakistan's retaliatory strikes against Iran for alleged Iranian militant attacks in Pakistan. Overall, the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have only increased over the weeks. However, oil markets have largely shrugged aside the risk due to a lack of physical disruption to oil shipments and weak macro fundamentals. But increased risk in the Middle East is probably putting a floor to oil prices amid weak demand. S&P Global expects fundamentals to improve in the second half of 2024 and prices to move up. Still, OPEC+ market management and the alignment between Saudi Arabia and Russia on OPEC+ policy will be critical for oil markets in 2024. S&P Global forecasts Platts Dated Brent to average $83/b in 2024 and $76/b in 2025. A sharper economic slowdown or disagreement within OPEC+ on production restrain remains the biggest risk for oil markets going into 2024. By: Sambit Mohanty, Editorial Lead, Asia Energy News, S&P Global Commodity Insights, S & P Global Commodity Insights Further reading: Red Sea shipping risk

News

Infographic: What China’s lower GDP growth means for 2024 commodity demand

China on Jan. 17 released its 2023 GDP growth at 5.2%, meeting its target set in March last year. S&P Global projects China’s 2024 GDP growth to slow to 4.7% after the country's annual economic conference held in December implied that any fiscal and monetary measures taken in 2024 were unlikely to be more aggressive than in 2023. This sets a weak tone for commodity markets in terms of end-user demand. Click here to see the full size version