CONTAINER PREMIUMS: Trans-Pacific rates rangebound on sluggish demand

Banner Image

All-inclusive container rates into North America were rangebound at depressed levels during the week ended April 22 amid weak demand for cargoes out of Asia.

As many North Asian cities and production regions remain under lockdown, US cargo owner sources indicated that Asian exports were increasingly difficult to book, compounded by a raft of port omissions on the part of ocean liners. Despite this, demand remained low, as the market is off-season.

"Not seeing anything in five digits," a North American forwarder source said. "No premiums at all, I don't know if that's just temporary because of what's happening in China."

During the week ended April 22, S&P Global Commodity Insights heard scant all-inclusive rates on the North Asia-North America run at slight premiums to market FAK rates, although significant pockets of FAK space were available out of North Asian gateways, particularly on bookings made with new entrants and charter players.

Sources pegged inbound premium rates at just $1,000-2,000/FEU above base rates for prompt loadings.

While booking activity remained muted against pre-Lunar New Year demand, sentiment held that purchasing and resultant rates were primed to hike from mid-May onward as the market pivots towards the traditional peak import season.

Southeast Asia-North America lane steady

The all-inclusive premium rates on the Southeast Asia-North America route were largely stable in the week ending April 22.

The all-inclusive container freight from Southeast Asia for East Coast North America was heard at $17,000-$18,000/FEU and at $15,000-$16,000/FEU for West Coast North America, sources said.

The all-inclusive premium rate was steady despite softening of the basic FAK rate on the Southeast Asia-West Coast North America route. Basic freight on this route dropped by $1,700/FEU on the week to $7,800/FEU, as shippers preferred to route cargoes to the US East Coast in anticipation of delays on the west coast, whereport labor union talks are expected to start in May.

A source said the negotiations in the past have been rife with disputes that led to long delays in clearing shipments from ports.

"This time logistics are already stretched, and shippers don't want to take any chances," the source said, adding that they are now preferring to shift cargoes to East Coast North America.

Although there was a drop in basic freight, the premium on this route was stable.

"Most shippers in the sport market are paying the premium price to secure bookings because even though the carriers display lower FAK rates on their websites, there is no space at that price point," another source said.

Market participants expected premiums to increase in May once lockdowns in China are lifted and demand for containers from Far East Asia tightens equipment availability in Southeast Asia.

Asia-Europe market trends further south

Container rates from Asia to Europe continued to slip, albeit gently, over the course of the week as demand continued to tail off, with the market waiting for news from Shanghai before booking more goods to leave the region.

"Rates are coming down because there just isn't demand, it's a simple as that," a European freight forwarder said. "Why pay for delays when you could just wait?"

As a result of the lockdowns, however, delays have started rising at other Chinese ports, including a larger vessel queue offshore Shanghai.

"People are starting to pick up their enquiry from SE Asia where they can," a third freight forwarder said. "There are a few other Chinese major ports that are seeing some form of spike in demand, if there is any way to move goods out of China, people are eyeing it up. Sadly as Shanghai is the largest port, no matter what people try and do, there simply isn't the capacity at other ports to export goods."

Platts Container Rate 1, from North Asia to the North Continent, fell a further $100 on the week to $12,000/FEU, the same level as in mid-June 2021 and the lowest rates recorded for over ten months. Meanwhile, PCR11, from North Asia to the UK, fell $150 over the same period to $13,100/FEU April 22.

Tags

  • Shipping

Related content

News

Interactive: Seaborne trade in Russian oil under G7 price cap

Russia, one of the world’s largest oil suppliers, has increasingly turned to non-Western firms to transport its crude to overseas buyers during its ongoing war with Ukraine . With a dual goal of undermining Russia’s war chest without creating significant disruptions to global supplies amid inflation pressure, G7 countries and their allies have banned tanker operators, insurers and other services firms from facilitating seaborne Russian crude exports unless the barrels are sold for no more than $60/b. The price cap regime, which came into force Dec. 5, 2022, does not directly cover tankers flagged, owned and operated by companies outside the G7, the EU, Australia, Switzerland and Norway, and not insured by Western protection and indemnity clubs. While such ships tend to be older and less maintained, their share in Russia’s crude exports market has been rising in recent months amid strengthening prices of Urals -- the OPEC+ member’s flagship crude grade -- and tightening sanctions enforcement by the West. Non-price-capped tankers have a larger market share in shipping Russia’s Pacific crude exports, according to analysis of S&P Global Commodities at Sea and Maritime Intelligence Risk Suite data. Crudes such as Sokol, Sakhalin Blend, and Eastern Siberia–Pacific Ocean grades are more often involved in these trades than Russian barrels from Baltic or Black Sea ports like Urals. Tanker operators in Greece, Europe’s top shipowning nation, managed to keep their traditionally strong market position in Russia in the first few months since the price cap took effect before giving ways to their peers in the UAE, Russia, China and Hong Kong. (Latest update: April 5, 2024)

News

Infographic: Oil trade adjusts to Red Sea turmoil despite latest attacks

Red Sea shipping volumes have slumped more than 60% since November as vessels opt for the longer Cape route to avoid Houthi attacks. But even as the severity of the attacks mounts, freight rates have retreated from recent highs and oil-on-water may have peaked as trade flows adjust. Click to see the full-size infographic

News

Red Sea turmoil has so far spared oil supplies, but buyers have reasons to worry

A series of attacks on shipping routes in the Red Sea has so far spared oil supplies from witnessing major disruptions, but oil importing countries are spending sleepless nights amid concerns that any escalation could potentially alter the situation drastically. Although the attacks disrupted container shipping lines, oil shipments remain largely stable. However, concerns stem from the fact that supply chains will likely have to adjust very quickly should the disruption persist. As existing oil tanker contracts are often hard to change, some ongoing traffic will continue to move through Red Sea passages. Any new insurance issued for Red Sea routes could add about $1/b or more to voyage costs, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights. Re-routing will increase voyage length, in-transit times and fuel costs. In addition, it will result in higher vessel utilizations, which could lift global freight rates as well as widen inter-regional crude spreads. Surely, more ships are avoiding the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab strait after a spate of attacks by Yemen's Houthi militants, threatening the strategic chokepoint for global seaborne trade. Many shippers, tanker owners and some oil companies have suspended voyages through the area. Russia's oil exports are particularly exposed to further Red Sea disruptions as Moscow ships some 80% of its crude to Asian markets. The attacks are expected to keep insurance costs high and prompt many tankers to take the longer route via the Cape of Good Hope, increasing ton miles and voyage durations, as well as tightening supplies and driving up freight rates. Even for the route via the Suez Canal, higher fees effective this year combined with a carbon tax for Europe-bound cargoes, will increase overall costs for charterers. Special report: Taking the long way around: Ships divert from the Panama Canal Although the rerouting of tankers away from the Red Sea, a major conduit for oil loaded in Russia, will surely raise shipping costs, the impact will be transitory. Roughly 7 million-8 million b/d of crude oil and products transited the Red Sea in recent months, according to S&P Global data. The market, for sure, will adjust to the changing flows, but the re-routing will lead to more oil on the water for a longer period of time. Russian crude shipments, should they avoid the Red Sea, are most affected due to a much longer haul to Asia around Africa. And amid tighter fleet capacity, lingering geopolitical conflicts are expected to boost tanker freight in 2024 despite ongoing OPEC+ supply cuts and a possible slowdown in oil demand growth. Implications for Asia As the biggest oil importing region, Asia may not witness dramatic changes to near-term oil supplies amid the ongoing Red Sea crisis, but refiners are chalking out alternative plans to ensure steady feedstock flows in the event of an escalation, a move that could inflate insurance costs and crimp refining margins. Although the region relies on imported oil for the bulk of its needs, the strategic push among Asia's top importers to massively diversify their import baskets over the years, as well as expand strategic storage, will come in handy to ensure smooth and uninterrupted flow of feedstocks. The Red Sea crisis has three aspects to it, as far as Asian oil flows are concerned. First, any escalation will create hurdles for Russian crude flowing to Asia, forcing buyers to look for substitutes from other origins. Secondly, for products moving from Asia to Europe, exporters are cautiously watching developments before taking the plunge. And lastly, longer routes have the potential to create incremental bunker fuel demand in Asia. Oil flows into China have not been impacted much by the Red Sea turbulence, as fewer cargoes are headed there on that route. In addition, the impact on Russian oil flows to India has been minimal, with no major diversions seen so far. Russia contributed over 35% of India's total crude imports in 2023, amounting to 1.7 million b/d, according to S&P Global data. Asian oil buyers are not necessarily concerned about Middle Eastern sour crude supplies for 2024, as major sellers, including Saudi Aramco and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., fully respect Asian customers' demand regardless of their production cut commitments. However, the economics for cracking Middle Eastern sour crude have been deteriorating as the costs of bringing Persian Gulf barrels to the Far East have been rising with shippers demanding risk premiums, while tanker insurance costs are also trending higher. Asian refiners may even look at cutting Middle Eastern term contractual volumes and explore other options like African, US and South American crudes to maximize margins. US crudes, for one, is becoming increasingly more attractive for Asian refiners as the price of lighter and sweeter WTI crude is nearly on par with high-sulfur Persian Gulf grades on a delivered basis. Supply cushion The attacks in the Red Sea continued even after the US-led alliance took military action to establish deterrence. The risk of a wider escalation also increased with Pakistan's retaliatory strikes against Iran for alleged Iranian militant attacks in Pakistan. Overall, the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have only increased over the weeks. However, oil markets have largely shrugged aside the risk due to a lack of physical disruption to oil shipments and weak macro fundamentals. But increased risk in the Middle East is probably putting a floor to oil prices amid weak demand. S&P Global expects fundamentals to improve in the second half of 2024 and prices to move up. Still, OPEC+ market management and the alignment between Saudi Arabia and Russia on OPEC+ policy will be critical for oil markets in 2024. S&P Global forecasts Platts Dated Brent to average $83/b in 2024 and $76/b in 2025. A sharper economic slowdown or disagreement within OPEC+ on production restrain remains the biggest risk for oil markets going into 2024. By: Sambit Mohanty, Editorial Lead, Asia Energy News, S&P Global Commodity Insights, S & P Global Commodity Insights Further reading: Red Sea shipping risk

News

Infographic: What China’s lower GDP growth means for 2024 commodity demand

China on Jan. 17 released its 2023 GDP growth at 5.2%, meeting its target set in March last year. S&P Global projects China’s 2024 GDP growth to slow to 4.7% after the country's annual economic conference held in December implied that any fiscal and monetary measures taken in 2024 were unlikely to be more aggressive than in 2023. This sets a weak tone for commodity markets in terms of end-user demand. Click here to see the full size version