Five key questions for national oil companies in 2023

Banner Image

National oil companies (NOCs) comprise a range of petroleum resource holders and resource seekers. This group features companies with significant resources at home and other companies that must pursue these resources abroad to meet domestic oil and gas demand. Within this peer group, the one thing that NOCs have in common is state ownership. The 25 NOCs that fall under the coverage of S&P Global Commodity Insights differ in terms of their proved reserves base, production capacity, economic importance to the state, contributions to domestic budgets, and autonomy from their host governments. In a recently published report, we presented five key questions for NOCs that will guide their strategies as well as our research agenda for 2023.

1. Is geographic portfolio concentration a risk or a safeguard? Most NOCs are national in nature, with a high concentration of their reserves and production located within their borders. Dominance at home—where the company operates most of its country's oil and gas reserves—gives that NOC added leverage relative to peers. However, this also tends to come with more responsibilities, including extra taxes, local employment obligations, and a requirement to subsidize energy prices. For NOCs based in resource-deprived countries, they could face pressure from the state to venture abroad to satisfy domestic energy needs.

2. Do reserves-to-production (R/P) ratios still matter? For decades, R/P ratios have been used as an important industry metric for measuring a company's ability to sustain its current performance and grow its business. For NOCs with high ratios, untapped oil and gas reserves were viewed as the company's "bank" for the future. However, with governments and NOCs seeking to reduce their carbon footprints to combat climate change, a higher ratio is no longer a measure of long-term success but could indicate which NOCs could get stuck with stranded assets that do not get developed and remain underground.

3. With accelerated monetization now a primary goal, where are the partnership opportunities? Growing concerns about climate change are prompting governments to accelerate resource monetization. In this regard, operational capability will be a key determinant of each NOC's ability to strike the balance between petroleum monetization and climate protection. NOCs with higher operational capabilities will have more scope to operate oil and gas projects successfully on their own while those with fewer operational capabilities will be more reliant on external partners and investor friendly domestic conditions to monetize resources.

4. Will NOCs take a more definitive step into the low-carbon sector? Many NOCs have a state mandate to focus on the domestic petroleum sector or go abroad in the event that resources at home are scarce. Yet, as climate concerns have moved to the forefront, some governments are tasking NOCs with new responsibilities to invest in alternative, low-carbon energy sources. While exploration and production are likely to remain their core function, some NOCs are taking steps to invest in other energy sources as a part of strategic diversification. This pressure can be more acute for resource-strained NOCs or those who have a higher share of external financing.

5. What are NOCs doing to green their operations? Even those NOCs that are determined to keep their focus on the petroleum sector are having to adapt to new realities as pressure grows for them to address climate change. NOCs are increasingly taking steps to decarbonize their existing activities and ensure that they maintain "social license" to operate in the oil and gas sphere. This includes significant investments to "green" their operations, from reducing carbon intensity from production, to cutting methane emissions, to electrifying offshore operations—all of which improve operational efficiencies and reduce carbon footprints.

Material for this post is taken from the full report, entitled "Five key questions for national oil companies in 2023", which is available to clients of S&P Global Commodity Insights—Upstream Companies & Transactions. The report contains an in-depth analysis of these questions, additional graphics, as well as region-specific insights.

For an in-depth assessment of financial and operational capabilities across the 25 NOCs in our coverage, see the S&P Global Commodity Insights NOC Benchmarking Tool. For an in-depth operational assessment of reserves, exploration, and strategic partners across the 25 NOCs in our coverage, see the S&P Global Commodity Insights NOC Operations Dashboard. These dashboards are only available to clients of S&P Global Commodity Insights—Upstream Companies & Transactions.

Tags

  • Upstream

Related content

News

Infographic: Ukraine invasion having profound impact on oil trade flows

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has had a profound impact on sour crude export destinations, and increased the appetite for sweet crudes among European refiners. Platts methodology has evolved to reflect this changing landscape. Click here to see the full-size infographic.

News

US EIA projects 2024 coal exports down 9% on year at 91 mil st

Coal production to hit all-time low of 489 mil st Coal to cede generation share to renewables Nominal average delivered coal prices at $2.49/MMbtu The US Energy Information Administration Jan. 9 revised downward its 2024 coal export projection to 91 million st, which if realized would be 9% lower than 2023 exports of 100 million st. The EIA's January Short-Term Energy Outlook marked a 2.7% downward revision on the month for 2024 projected coal exports. Coal exports in 2025 are projected to recover 4.8% on the year to 95.4 million st. Lower coal demand was reflected in the EIA's 2024 US coal production estimate representing an all-time low. The EIA projected that coal production will fall 15.9% on the year to 489.3 million st in 2024 before declining another 12.4% year on year to 428.8 million st in 2025. Total coal consumption was projected at 391.3 million st in 2024, up 1.6% from the prior month's projection. The EIA estimated 2025 total coal consumption at 361.7 million st. For the electric power sector, coal consumption was estimated at 351.9 million st in 2024, down 8.4% from the prior year. For 2025, electric power sector coal consumption was projected at 322.2 million st, which would be an all-time low if realized, according to EIA data going back to 1997. Nominal average delivered coal prices were estimated at $2.49/MMbtu in 2024, down from $2.52/MMBtu in 2023. The EIA projected that 2025 nominal average delivered coal prices would shrink further to $2.44/MMBtu. Platts assessed US over-the-counter Central Appalachia 12,500 Btu/lb CSX rail coal for February delivery unchanged on the session at $72.40/st Jan. 8, showed data from S&P Global Commodity Insights. The assessment was based on broker indications of value at $72/st and $72.75/st, tested in the market through 4:30 pm ET. The Jan. 8 CAPP assessment at $72.40/st was equivalent to $2.896/MMBtu. The CAPP coal price averaged $81.12/st in 2023, the equivalent of $3.245/MMBtu. Powder River Basin 8,800 Btu/lb rail coal for prompt-month delivery closed at $13.95/st Jan. 8, unchanged on the session, based on broker indications of value at $13.85/st and $14/st. The assessment at $13.95/st was equivalent to $0.793/MMbtu. The coal averaged $14.46/MMbtu in 2023, the equivalent of $0.822/MMBtu. In line with falling coal consumption, coal's share of US power generation is expected to slip to 14.8% in 2024, down from 16.6% in 2023. The EIA projected coal generation at 13.3% in 2025 as renewables generation increases. Renewable energy sources totaled 21.8% of 2023 US generation share. Generation from renewables was projected to rise to 24% in 2024 and 25.9% in 2025. Nuclear generation's share was estimated to remain steady between 19.2% and 19.3% between 2024 and 2025. Natural gas generation, which constituted 41.9% of the US generation share in 2023, was projected to fall to 41.5% in 2024 and 41.1% in 2025. The EIA estimated that the Henry Hub spot price will average $2.76/MMbtu in 2024, down from the December 2024 estimate of $2.90/MMBtu. For 2024, the EIA projected Henry Hub prices at $3.06/MMBtu. The prompt-month NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract settled at $2.98/MMBtu Jan. 8, according to CME Group data. In 2023, the Henry Hub price averaged $2.665/MMBtu. Dry natural gas production was estimated at 105.04 Bcf/day in 2024, up from 103.54 Bcf/d in 2023. The EIA estimated that dry natural gas production would increase to 106.38 Bcf/d in 2025. LNG exports are expected to rise 4.4% on the year to 12.36 Bcf/d in 2024 before jumping 16.7% year on year to 14.42 Bcf/d in 2025. Total natural gas consumption for 2024 was projected at 89.91 Bcf/d, up 1.1% on the year. Total consumption of natural gas was projected to fall 0.2% on the year to 89.71 Bcf/d in 2025. Natural gas consumption in the US power sector was projected to rise 1.1% on the year to 35.54 Bcf/d in 2024. The EIA estimated that 2025 natural gas consumption in the US power sector will decline 0.7% on the year to 35.29 Bcf/d.

News

Shell flags weak Q4 refining ahead of Singapore selloff

Sees $2.5 bil-$4.5 bil impairment amid weak margins Throughput impacted by North America maintenance Upstream output set to steady in Q4 Shell on Jan. 8 highlighted a weak fourth quarter for its refining and chemicals unit due to lower margins and a maintenance impact on throughput, as it warned investors of an expected financial impairment of $2.5 billion-$4.5 billion, primarily in the downstream. Shell said in December it plans to offload its 500,000 b/d Singapore refining and chemicals operations due to a lack of advantage in feedstock, energy and utility costs, starkly contrasting with the company's earlier enthusiasm for opportunities in Asia in the previous decade. Shell's global indicative refining margin dropped from $15.72/b in Q3 2023 to $10/b in Q4, and it said it expected significantly lower results from chemicals and products trading compared with Q3, with the chemicals and products unit set for an adjusted earnings loss. Results were also affected by a slump in refinery throughput to a range of 78%-82%, a level reminiscent of the pandemic, but due to planned maintenance at its North American refining operations. Shell's North American downstream business is spread across two sites in Canada and one in the US: the 100,000 b/d Scotford refinery in Alberta, which processes synthetic crude derived from oil sands, and the 85,000 b/d Sarnia refinery near Ontario, as well as the 250,000 b/d Norco refinery in Louisiana. Scotford was expected to operate at reduced levels during maintenance in October, while Norco was expected to be under maintenance for most of that month, S&P Global Commodity Insights reported earlier. Steadier upstream Elsewhere in its business, there were some signs of more stable upstream production, with the midpoint of Shell's guidance for the upstream unit higher than output in Q4 2022. It forecast production in a range of 1.83 million-1.93 million b/d of oil equivalent, offset by a potential fall in production in the LNG-focused Integrated Gas unit, to 880,000-920,000 boe/d. Shell's oil output declined significantly between 2019 and 2022, and particularly during 2022. Shell confirmed its earlier guidance that LNG liquefaction volumes for Q4 2023 were higher than a year earlier, in a range of 6.9 million-7.3 million mt, although that is also significantly below pre-2022 levels. It added that financial results from LNG trading were expected to be "significantly higher" than in Q3 2023 due to "seasonality and increased optimization opportunities." The Platts Dated Brent benchmark was assessed $4.53/b lower on average in Q4 2023 compared with a year earlier at $84.34/b. Platts is part of S&P Global Commodity Insights.

News

US POWER TRACKER: West power prices plunge on year on El Nino impacts

Sumas spot gas down 90.6% year on year CAISO solar generation up 6 points in Dec US West power forwards are trending roughly 50% lower than year-ago packages on weaker gas forwards and above-normal temperatures forecast with El Nino weather conditions to linger into spring. El Nino conditions, which typically occur January through March, tend to bring more rain to the US Southwest and warmer-than-normal temperatures. The three-month outlook indicates a greater probability for above-normal temperatures across most of the Western US, with the exception of the Desert Southwest, according to the US National Weather Service's Climate Prediction Center. SP15 on-peak January rolled off the curve at $55.75/MWh, 79.4% lower than where the 2023 package ended, according to data from Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights. The February package is currently in the low 50s/MWh, 70% below where its 2023 counterpart was a year earlier, while the March package is in the mid-$30s/MWh, 55.4% lower. In gas forwards, SoCal January rolled off the curve at $3.779/MMBtu, 97.9% below where the 2023 contract ended a year earlier, according to S&P Global data. The February contract is currently around $4.063/MMBtu, 78.9% lower than its 2023 counterpart at the same time last year, while the March contract is about $2.816/MMBtu, 63.2% lower. Gas plants burned an average of 1.815 Bcf/d in December to generate an average of 267.167 GWh/d, an analysis of S&P Global data showed. That's down 0.66% from November and a drop of 11.2 % from 2023. S&P Global forecast CAISO's gas fleet to generate around 220 GWh/d in February. In comparison, burning fuel at the same rate as February 2023 would consume 1.758 Bcf/d, a 6% decrease year on year. Spot markets In spot markets, power prices were down significantly from a year ago, when cold weather hit the region and drove up prices. SP15 on-peak day-ahead locational marginal prices averaged $43.49/MWh in December, 83% lower year over year and 11.2% below November prices, according to California Independent System Operator data. Helping pull down power prices, spot gas at SoCal city-gate was down 88.4% year on year and 40% lower month on month at an average of $3.554/MMBtu in December, according to S&P Global data. In the Northwest, Sumas spot gas was down 90.6% year on year at an average of $2.669/MMBtu. The decline in spot gas prices likely accounts for the lower average spot power prices month on month in December, said Morris Greenberg, senior manager with the low-carbon electricity team at S&P Global. Compared to a year earlier, CAISO population-weighted temperatures averaged 8% higher in December, resulting in 38.4% fewer heating-degree days, according to CustomWeather data. Fuel mix Thermal generation remained the lead fuel source at 46.1% of the total fuel mix in December, little changed year on year, while solar generation was up nearly 6 percentage points to average 14.7% of the mix, according to CAISO data. Hydropower remained strong, averaging 8% of the December fuel mix, 2 points higher than a year earlier. Total generation was down nearly 8% from a year earlier at an average of roughly 23.4 GWh/day, as peakload slipped 2% year on year to average 27.254 GW in December, according to CAISO data. In the Northwest, peakload dropped nearly 11% year on year to average 7.89 GW in December, according to Bonneville Power Administration data. Hydropower remained the lead fuel source at nearly 74% of the mix, followed by nuclear at 12.3%, thermal at 9.6% and wind at 4.3%. Following El Nino expectations of the Northwest for warmer temperatures and drier precipitation, BPA population-weighted temperatures in December were 10% above normal and 21.5% higher than a year earlier, leading to 27% fewer heating-degrees days year on year, according to CustomWeather data.