Soil carbon credits: Opportunities and challenges ahead

Banner Image

Corporate interest in reducing and offsetting greenhouse gas emissions has grown substantially in the past decade. With more than one-third of the world's largest publicly traded companies now committed to net-zero goals, according to the Net Zero Tracker, carbon credit offsets have been touted as a way for the private sector to reach its decarbonization targets.

One nature-based offset, soil carbon credit, has begun to gain traction particularly in the US and Australia, yet several challenges impede the take-off of such projects globally.

Opportunities

The intersection of voluntary carbon markets and agriculture has become increasingly important in the face of global climate change.

The agriculture industry contributes significantly to GHG emissions, yet there are numerous opportunities for the implementation of agricultural practices that reduce, avoid, or remove emissions from the sector.

Carbon is sequestered by plants during the process of photosynthesis. As plants photosynthesize, carbon dioxide is pulled out of the atmosphere and eventually stored below ground within soil organic matter. Soil organic matter is created through the decomposition of plants, the breakdown of animal waste, and through various processes involving soil microorganisms.

Land management practices greatly influence the amount of carbon sequestered in soil. Practices that increase the amount of soil carbon stored include reduced or no tillage, prevention of overgrazing, reduction or increased precision of fertilizer application, and the maintenance of ground cover through cover cropping.

According to Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, nature-based carbon sequestration projects, including soil carbon projects, represent the most cost-effective methods of storing carbon.

Apart from being a cost-effective tool for reducing emissions from the agriculture sector, soil carbon projects also represent a long-term investment and source of income for farmers. As most farmers live season to season and often work off-farm jobs to get by, so-called "carbon farming" presents an opportunity to reward farmers for switching to more regenerative agricultural practices. For example, farmers in the US can earn up to $30/acre/year from participating in soil carbon projects, according to US-based project developer Indigo Ag's website.

Public policy

Countries such as the US and Australia have begun incorporating soil carbon sequestration into climate mitigation plans and policies, creating an opportunity for soil carbon projects to grow in popularity.

In the US, President Joe Biden has pushed soil carbon sequestration as an important component of climate mitigation, suggesting in his first address before Congress in April 2021 that farmers should be getting paid for growing cover crops.

In June 2021, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to pass the Growing Climate Solutions Act, a bill that would make it easier for farmers to participate in voluntary carbon markets. The bill sat stagnant in the House of Representatives until recently when it was included in the omnibus spending bill passed on Dec. 23. The legislation is set to reduce barriers of entry for the voluntary carbon market by establishing a US Department of Agriculture certification program for third-party verifiers and providing technical assistance on generating and selling carbon credits. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has suggested that one long-term solution for promoting the development of carbon markets in the US is through the Commodity Credit Corporation, which could act as a carbon bank.

In Australia, the storage of carbon dioxide in soil is one of the major goals of the government's Technology Investment Roadmap, which represents an important part of the country's long-term emissions reduction plan. Under the country's Emissions Reduction Fund scheme, project developers can participate in the compliance-based market by following various established methodologies, such as for soil carbon sequestration, to generate Australian Carbon Credit Units, or ACCUs. There are 433 soil carbon projects registered under the ERF as of Feb. 13, according to a spokesperson from Australia's Clean Energy Regulator.

Challenges

"There's no getting around the complexity of agriculture mixed with the complexity of the carbon market," Max DuBuisson, head of sustainability policy and engagement at Indigo Ag, said in an interview with S&P Commodity Insights earlier this year.

The viability of carbon farming as a value-add for farmers is limited by several factors, such as the upfront costs of soil sampling and project registration, the opportunity cost of changing practices, potential near-term reduction in yields and the market price of nature-based carbon credits.

The complexity and differences between the various standards for soil carbon quantification presents another challenge for farmers due to the potential variability in the quality of credits produced and thus the marketability of those credits.

Permanence and additionality are also contentious issues when discussing soil carbon projects. The additionality of projects, or showing that the changes in carbon stocks wouldn't have occurred without the financial incentive of credit generation, limits participation in the carbon market to farmers that have not yet adopted sustainable practices. For example, farmers that already sow cover crops in their rotations would not be able to benefit from participating in the carbon market.

The permanence of storing carbon presents a challenge for the take-off of soil carbon projects as the length of carbon storage in soil varies based on the biological, chemical, and physical properties of soil. Additionally, as almost half of all farmlands in the US are rented according to the USDA, changes in land ownership or management could result in a reversal in carbon storage.

Furthermore, up to tens of thousands of acres are needed to enable feasible, cost-effective credit generation, DuBuisson said, adding that this imperative for scale to make the numbers work has likely held the market back. "You really need larger projects to make it work."

The aggregation of fields to generate credits is the most common way to address the issue of scale as this reduces the upfront financial burden of sampling each field. Project developers in the US and Australia have taken an aggregation approach by taking a subset of soil samples from different farms to determine baseline carbon stocks and then using models or remeasurement to determine changes in carbon stocks under the project scenario.

Pricing

Currently, carbon prices are too low for soil carbon projects to be profitable unless done on a massive scale or unless they attract a major premium for the credits generated. For reference, Platts, a part of S&P Global, assessed CRC current year, which reflects the most competitive price for nature-based and technology-based removal credits, at $12.30/mtCO2e on Feb. 21.

"Today a soil carbon project needs to be delivered at scale and requires a carbon price of $30+ to be viable," Louise Edmonds, CEO and founder of Carbon Sync, an Australia-based project developer, told S&P Global via email on Jan. 30.

Under the Carbon by Indigo program, Indigo Ag sold credits generated at $20/credit when the program first launched. It has since increased with a wave of contracts sold at $27 and $40/credit. With farmers receiving 75% of the revenue from credits sold, farmers participating in the Carbon by Indigo program may receive up to $30/credit generated.

"We tend to be selling out well ahead of the sort of market average prices," DuBuisson said. With the average acre generating around 0.2 credits/year, "we do you need that price to be even higher, to make this a really, really valuable sort of addition to the farmer's business," DuBuisson added.

For context, a 1,000-acre farm would generate around 200 credits/year on average, and if valued at $40/credit, the farmer would earn only about $6,000/year of additional income for conducting a soil carbon project.

With the return on investment fairly low and possible short-term decreases in yield from adopting regenerative practices, the price of soil carbon credits would have to rise substantially, or additional incentives would need to be implemented, for farmers to participate in the carbon market on a larger scale.

Tags

  • Agriculture

  • Energy Transition

Related content

Thought Leadership

Interactive: The Platts Benchmark Heatmap

The price wall visualizes 258 of the most important price benchmarks assessed by Platts across various commodities from crude through to chemicals, LNG and carbon. The wall shows the price performance of these benchmarks over 2023 based on their indexed value from the first day of trading. Click on the commodity button to isolate different groups of resources to see which performed best in 2023, a year that saw dramatic changes in trade flows and demand because of sanctions and price caps on Russian commodities and a recovering post-COVID global economy. Isolate individual benchmarks by clicking on the tile to reveal a unique QR code to navigate to specific Platts methodology pages and average price data for 2022 and 2023. Click to start exploring

Thought Leadership

Fueling the Future: Biofuels driving progress on net zero

The role of biofuels in energy transition is growing, as they can help decarbonize hard-to-abate transport sectors, but more supply is needed to keep the world on track with net-zero goals. S&P Global Commodity Insights explores how regional policies are driving adoption and evolving technology is widening the feedstock pool, as well as supply and demand outlooks across transport sectors. READ MORE

Thought Leadership

INTERVIEW: Upstream investments crucial for 'just transition' to cleaner fuels: Invenire Energy

India must keep investing in the upstream sector to ensure higher oil and gas production to avoid possible supply problems or volatile energy prices, as it embraces technologies that are more environment friendly, Mannish Mahesshwari, CEO of Invenire Energy, told S&P Global Commodity Insights. "Flipping the lens to energy security, sustained under investment in upstream without substitutional capacity and substantial scale in clean and new energy could have far reaching consequences in the journey of just transition," Mahesshwari said on the sidelines of the India Energy Week in Goa. Most of assets of private equity backed Invenire are discovered fields in India that the company has acquired through secondary market purchases from other firms as well as through primary acquisitions directly from the government. The company also has assets in Indonesia and East Africa. The private upstream firm is looking to accelerate production of oil and gas from the discovered fields in its portfolio but has no plans to venture into exploration in the foreseeable future. "We are putting our money where our mind is. As a company, our ability to understand the rocks and the molecules is relatively better than the electrons. We are investing in today's energy system, which is mainly oil and helping in phasing out coal with the help of low-carbon gas," Mahesshwari said. He said that the transition to a world of net zero is more certain today than envisaged in 2015, the year of the Paris Agreement. However, it is the uncertainty around the energy transition pace that adds complexity and risk for upstream projects. The upstream industry has been avoiding spending on projects that would either lock in heavy emissions for years to come or quickly turn into stranded assets. Right focus Invenire currently holds stakes in nine blocks in India. Out of these, four are discovered small fields (DSF) blocks -- one in Assam and three in Mumbai offshore -- comprising a total of about 100 million barrels equivalent of oil and gas. Invenire holds a 100% stake in the four DSF acreages. The company has a small production portfolio of about 12,000 b/d but has plans to boost that volume to 35,000 b/d by 2025. According to S&P Global, Invenire Energy's upstream plans show ambition and promise, considering the wider competitive landscape in India. The company's experience of operating in a tough post-2014 upstream period that saw oil prices slump will certainly influence its post-2023 growth ambitions. For assets outside India, the company might have plans to become a non-operator joint venture partner to take stakes in small-to-medium sized producing assets. The company's focus has been on monetizing discovered resources, having both operator and non-operator portfolios, S&P Global said. Besides India, Invenire has producing fields with 45.55% participating interest in a material acreage located in South Sumatra Basin in Indonesia. "The upstream industry's main focus now is to deliver the supply required to meet demand. Most of the industry's oil and gas investment for the rest of this decade will target advantaged resources -- those with the lowest cost, least risk, and possibly lowest Scope 1 emissions. Beyond this decade, to meet demand, the industry will depend increasingly on late-life reserves growth from legacy supply sources." Mahesshwari said. Similar views Mahesshwari's views echoed comments made by state-run upstream producers ONGC Ltd. and Oil India Ltd. at the IEW conference. ONGC Ltd., which contributes about 74% of India's crude oil and around 63% of its natural gas production, has been actively looking to widen its upstream portfolio as it believes that oil and gas will be a major component of the country's energy mix for the next three decades, while pursuing new crude-to-chemicals projects to prepare for the changing energy landscape, its Chairperson Arun Kumar Singh told the conference. Oil India Ltd. is aiming to double its exploration acreage in the coming years and seeking partnerships to realize the hydrocarbon potential of offshore regions in Indian sedimentary basins, its Chairman and Managing Director Ranjit Rath said. Mahesshwari said that there is a need to take a balanced view of energy transition, adding that any shortfall in upstream investments can add to supply issues and volatile energy prices, as seen in recent years. While it's important to keep looking for opportunities to invest in low-carbon businesses, continuing to responsibly invest in the core upstream business will remain the priority for the company in the foreseeable future. "The potential in carbon capture utilization and storage is enormous, and the oil and gas sector has unique skills that make it ideally placed to lead in reducing CO2 and methane emissions and decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors through carbon upcycling," Mahesshwari said.

Thought Leadership

Wheat markets in India, Indonesia face uncertainty ahead of 2024 elections

Key players in the wheat trade, India and Indonesia are headed to the polls this year, and market sources believe that the role of agricultural policies is increasingly taking center stage, especially amid a backdrop of food security concerns and inflationary pressures. Recent elections in other countries that are also heavily involved in global grain production and trade have demonstrated the rising importance of agriculture in the political sphere. The recent presidential elections in Argentina were one such striking example. Export flows of Argentinian grains, especially wheat, had dropped significantly approaching the elections as farmers reportedly held back on sales in anticipation of the then-candidate Javier Milei's pledges to remove export taxes on grains. India, a major producer and former exporter has been embroiled in talks of wheat imports for months following an El Nino-battered wheat production and several large drawdowns in wheat reserves in 2023. The country's wheat reserves have been declining as the government is providing free-of-cost food grains to keep inflation in control ahead of the elections. The government's wheat reserves have fallen to a seven-year low, while providing free-of-cost food grains to keep inflation in control ahead of the elections. As of Dec. 31, 2023, the Food Corporation of India had 16.35 million mt wheat in government warehouses, compared with 17.17 million mt a year ago. However, if India ends up allowing wheat imports after the elections it may potentially lead to a rise in global wheat prices and weigh on returns for farmers, trade sources said. On the other hand, Indonesia is one of the biggest wheat importers in the world, and its citizens will be headed to the polls in two weeks' time to elect the eighth president of Indonesia. The potential introduction of a new wheat import tariff, depending on the outcome of the elections, may potentially add on to the burden of flour millers who are faced with rising operating costs and a slow rebound in downstream demand. India India's national elections are expected to be held during April-May with local media reports indicating a comeback of the ruling dispensations. Trade sources are not expecting significant changes to the trade policies before the elections, despite concerns that El Nino may weigh on India's wheat supply. "Since farmers are a key constituency in large wheat producing states, the ruling party is not willing to risk angering them and are not engaging in talks about imports," a trader based in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, said. Uttar Pradesh is the largest wheat producing state and also the most populous province in the country. While traders have been asking for a cut in import duty, the government is looking at planting progress before deciding on imports, an official with the agriculture ministry said. Currently, the government levies a 40% import duty on wheat. As of Jan. 22, Indian farmers planted wheat across 34 million hectares, against 33.8 million hectares last year, the Ministry of Agriculture reported. According to government officials, allowing imports could weigh on farmers' intentions to plant wheat. The government is also unwilling to let imports weigh on farmers' returns ahead of the general elections, the official with the farm ministry added. Market participants expect India's wheat harvest to shrink in MY 2023-24 (April-March) likely poor yields despite steady sowing. The government has pegged India's wheat harvest in MY 2023-24 at 114 million mt, 1% higher on the year. On the other hand, some trade participants believe if the wheat harvest rebounds the government may take a look at allowing exports after the elections. India had blocked wheat exports in May 2022 amid rising food inflation due to poor harvest. If the output is better than expected, the government may be willing to allow exports but any significant changes to the trade policy is unlikely before the elections, a trader based in Mumbai said. Indonesia Indonesia is headed for a three-way fight in the country's upcoming presidential elections Feb. 14, with local media reports indicating that third-time candidate Prabowo Subianto and his running mate, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, who is the eldest son of Indonesia's current president Joko Widodo, continue to maintain a wide lead against the two other presidential candidates, Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo. The results of the presidential elections could have a significant impact on Indonesia's agricultural policies, as the country continues to lag behind its goal of reducing imports and achieving self-sufficiency. Notably, the Prabowo-Gibran pairing has announced their intention to introduce a number of new taxes upon election, including taxes on wheat imports. Prabowo was quoted in local media as claiming that the losses incurred from not taxing wheat imports were significant, and he further cited the examples of neighboring countries Thailand and Brunei, which tax wheat. Indonesia is one of the world's largest wheat importers, importing between 9-11 million mt of wheat annually. The latest data from Indonesia's Central Bureau of Statistics shows that the country imported 9.7 million mt of wheat between January to November 2023. Indonesia does not tax milling wheat imports, which make up the vast majority of the country's total wheat imports. Meanwhile, feed wheat imports are generally controlled by the state-owned livestock farming company, Berdikari, to protect the interests of local corn farmers. "There are definitely some concerns in the industry if wheat imports become taxable," said a source in Indonesia's flour milling industry. Additionally, there have been no indications as to what the tariff rate may be. "There's still a lot of uncertainty, so we can only wait for the final result [of the presidential elections]," added another source in the local food manufacturing industry.