Stellar growth for global LNG trade - Ezran Mahadzir, Petronas LNG

Banner Image

Global LNG trade witnessed a stellar growth in 2022, driven particularly by European demand as Russia's invasion of Ukraine meant sanctions resulting in, among other things, the sudden loss of pipeline gas. Emerging nations were also actively seeking cargoes for their soaring energy needs. The tight supply led to an unprecedented price volatility, causing significant demand destruction. What does the future hold for LNG markets and will the price volatility persist? How will Petronas LNG steer through? Petronas LNG CEO Ezran Mahadzir shares his views with S&P Global Commodity Insights Senior Editor Surabhi Sahu to answer these and other questions critical to global LNG trade.

How would you describe the dynamics in the LNG market over the past two years, particularly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine? Do you expect the price volatility to persist?

Before the Russia-Ukraine war, we went through COVID-19 lockdowns. That was also a shift. When the Ukraine crisis emerged, there wasn't enough supply to meet demand because prior to that, the price signals did not incentivize investments.

Being a long-term player in the LNG industry, we would like to see more stable LNG prices, which allow investments, and [prices that] are not too high to cause demand destruction. However, the market is expected to stay volatile in the medium term -- until new projects come toward 2026-27, with the Qatari expansion and new US Gulf projects.

The volatility makes it very difficult to predict prices but certainly I do not think they will be at the pre-COVID levels of $7-$8/MMBtu.

We also don't know to what extent the Israel-Gaza conflict would escalate. If new actors came in, you might see prices shoot up from present levels.

Given present storage inventory levels, it appears Europe is well prepared for the winter season. Inventory levels in North Asia are also healthy. We must commend the European market, both policy makers and players, for the speed at which they have increased capacity.

But a prolonged harsh weather could potentially trigger more spot market price volatility. To cope with demand and supply shocks, participants should focus on assessing that risk and strategize to mitigate disruptions.

It is also important for end-buyers to look at the situation from a long-term perspective. At the end of the day, energy security is still key.

Are shipping restrictions at the Panama Canal posing risks for Asian supply? How are players mitigating risks?

On the Pacific side, enough supply sources exist to meet current demand, particularly the historical long-term requirement of Japan and South Korea. However, with demand growth, supply to the market has become and is still slightly scarce.

That's where we, via our position in Bintulu, provide a competitive advantage because we are directly facing those markets. We don't have the risk of the Panama Canal and the region we're in is stable in terms of geopolitics.

Meanwhile, the challenges posed by the waterway have caused an uptick in LNG cargo swapping among industry players to trim risks in a volatile market as lack of investments amid growing LNG demand, uncertainty over severity of Northern Hemisphere winter and geopolitical risks lurk.

Related content

News: LNG freight rates from US Gulf Coast to NWE, Asia weaken as demand lags

Podcast: The wait is (still) on at the Panama Canal

At the end of day, irrespective of Panama Canal challenges, players should optimize their portfolio by collaborating in different ways including by swapping cargoes. Any cost savings will not only be advantageous for suppliers but will also benefit the market.

What kind of indexation would you favor when it comes to pricing LNG contracts?

I think that really depends on the market. Historically, LNG was always a conversion fuel to all.

In the company's traditional markets -- Japan, South Korea and even China -- the indexation formulas are still oil-linked, as opposed to TTF, Henry Hub, NBP in a much more liquid Atlantic market.

We are flexible so long as the prices and formula would allow a fair risk and reward, and the risks can be managed by all related parties. The formula we bring in is very much a two-way formula to solve various issues along the way.

Southeast Asia is certainly a region where we would not only like to participate in but also become a dominant supplier. The burgeoning population, economic size, need for energy and thrust on decarbonization policies in Southeast Asia means that it will be taking in more LNG and, given our geographical location, Petronas is able to supply LNG cargoes on a competitive basis.

How does Petronas see LNG's growth potential and what are some of the projects that you are excited about in this space?

In the medium and long term, we believe that the gas market will grow because it is the cleanest hydrocarbon source and a very good energy transition fuel. At the right price signals, the market will invest in future capacities.

Petronas has taken a final investment decision on a new project in Sabah -- ZLNG -- to bring in 2 million mt/year of LNG capacity by the second half of 2027.

We are quite excited about getting out our first cargo from LNG Canada. That should happen in the second half of 2024 as part of a commissioning program. There are also further opportunities to grow LNG Canada and we are in discussions to progress phase 2.

Separately, Petronas is in discussions with Argentina's YPF for a proposed LNG plant. If done properly, that could be a game changer for the world market.

Petronas also has an offtake contract with two parties in the US Gulf -- Cheniere and Venture Global.

Having new supply nodes allows us to further strengthen our portfolio globally. We can draw upon our experiences from the Pacific and apply it to the Atlantic.

How does Petronas view LNG bunkering prospects, given the push toward zero-carbon marine fuels?

We believe that the LNG bunkering market will grow. Our Pengerang regasification terminal provides a platform for reload and LNG bunkering operations. We also have a regasification terminal in Sungai Udang, Melaka, that can do reloads for LNG bunkering. We have a dedicated LNG bunkering vessel that plies in the Strait of Malacca, among the busiest shipping lanes in the world.

How is Petronas taking steps to harness cleaner LNG as it accelerates its energy transition journey?

It's important to distinguish between carbon abatement and actual carbon reduction. Carbon neutral LNG by buying carbon credits is an abatement process and we do that, having traded about six carbon neutral LNG cargoes, while also focusing on carbon footprint reduction.

At LNG Canada, the molecule itself has low carbon because it is shale gas. Along with partners, we are developing it to be among the lowest emissions LNG plant by using electrification and efficient gas turbines.

Upon completion in 2024, the Petronas LNG Complex in Bintulu will also begin shifting from old gas turbines to electrification from hydro. In addition, the company's LNG vessels are modern, fitted with new technologies and more efficient.

On the upstream side, Petronas has also taken an FID on the Kasawari carbon sequestration project offshore Sarawak. The project, which should come online in 2026, will result in about 3.3 million mt/year of CO2 capture, making it one of the largest carbon capture and storage projects worldwide.

Tags

  • LNG

  • Gas & Power

Related content

News

S&P Global Commodity Insights Weekly ET News Highlights – Apr 2, 2024

Japan's largest power producer tests ammonia as new fuel Energy transition highlights: Our editors and analysts bring together everything you need to know about the industry this week, from renewables to storage to carbon prices. JERA -- Japan's largest power generation company and one of the world’s largest power utilities --started testing ammonia cofiring at one of its largest thermal power plants this week. The project paves the way for the use of ammonia in the power sector on a commercial scale that has never been done before. Currently, ammonia is a largely a feedstock for fertilizer production with some of it going into chemicals. However, ammonia can be combusted with zero carbon emissions and it is one of the pathways being explored for the transportation of hydrogen as it has existing trade flows that can be expanded. These factors allow ammonia to become as an energy transition fuel. JERA started testing ammonia cofiring at its 1 GW No. 4 coal-fired unit at Hekinan thermal power plant in central Japan from April 1, to be carried out through June using about 40,000 mt of ammonia. The 20% cofiring of ammonia is expected to be the world's first at a large commercial coal-fired power plant and is part of a four-year long pilot project. JERA has pledged to commercialize its ammonia cofiring power generation by 2030 and use 100% ammonia as fuel in the 2040s for its 2050 carbon neutrality target. Japan sees great potential in ammonia as a CO2 zero-emission fuel as the country targets to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 46% by FY 2030-31 from FY 2013-14 levels and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 . Price of the week: Meanwhile, the price of emission allowances in China’s national compliance carbon market hit a new record on March 29 of Yuan 90.66/mtCO2e ($12.78/mtCO2e), increasing 8.1% week on week, according to Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange. The steady increase in Chinese carbon prices has been attributed to bullish sentiment and looming deadlines for meeting emissions obligations. Editor’s pick: Premium and free content SPGlobal.com Germany’s SHS launches green hydrogen tender for Saarland steel plants German steel producer Stahl-Holding-Saar has launched a tender to buy up to 50,000 mt of locally produced renewable hydrogen for its Dillinger and Saarstahl plants in Saarland, the company said March 26. SHS and its subsidiaries are due to produce up to 3.5 million mt/year of green steel from 2027/28. The move follows a tender from Thyssenkrupp for large volumes of clean hydrogen for its Duisburg plant in Germany from 2028. Platts Connect New open-source tool aims to inform on environmental impact of hydrogen The Open Hydrogen Initiative released March 25 an open-source tool for determining the carbon intensity of hydrogen as some industry members work to harmonize measurement methodologies. This new tool allows for the calculation of the carbon intensity of hydrogen production at the facility level based on the operational parameters of the facility and its supply chains, “capturing the nuances” of a project’s emissions, OHI Executive Director Zane McDonald Manchin, oil and gas groups urge flexibility, better coordination on methane fee Delays in implementing a fee on oil and gas system methane emissions and new greenhouse gas reporting rules are unfair to regulated companies and run counter to congressional intent, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Joe Manchin, Democrat-West Virginia, told the Environmental Protection Agency March 26. TES gets tariff, third-party exemption for German LNG, e-natural gas terminal Tree Energy Solutions has secured an exemption from tariff and third-party access regulation for its planned “e-LNG” import terminal at the Green Energy Hub in Wilhelmshaven from the German network regulator BNetzA. BNetzA has exempted the 15-Bcm/year terminal, which will import LNG before switching to green hydrogen-based “electric natural gas” (e-NG), for 20 years from the start of the operations.

News

Infographic: Bearish Q2 signals hold sway for European gas, power markets

Europe is entering its "gas summer" with prices back at what could be considered normal levels and with gas storage stocks in robust health. Another mild winter and weak demand have left the EU's gas storage sites filled to 59% of capacity, while demand in the EU and UK is set for a 3.7% year-on-year decline in Q2 2024, according to forecasts from S&P Global Commodity Insights. Meanwhile, electricity demand across ten core markets is forecast to rise 1.7% with Europe's power markets entering spring in the best supply shape since 2020. Solar output is forecast to exceed gas-fired power generation for the first time in Q2. Carbon prices are expected to show more resilience finding stability just above Eur60/mtCO2e after EU Allowances fell close to three-year lows. The European Commission is expected to release 2023 EU ETS verified emissions data on April 3 with S&P Global analysts forecasting a drop of 11% year-on-year. Read the full feature: Bearish Q2 signals hold sway for European gas, power markets (subscriber content) Click here to see the full-size infographic

News

Interactive: European LNG imports tracker

The sharp fall in Russian pipeline gas supplies to Europe through 2022 and the EU’s decision to diversify its gas imports away from Russia has prompted a major increase in European LNG imports and a large-scale expansion of LNG regasification capacity. The EU, UK and Turkey saw a combined 60% year-on-year increase in imports in 2022 and intake kept pace in 2023, with some 125.5 million mt (173 Bcm) of LNG delivered last year, marginally lower than the 127.6 million mt in 2022, S&P Global Commodity Insights data showed. The expansion of Europe’s import capacity is also set to continue, with more floating capacity additions expected in Germany in 2024 and Greece having taken the first LNG into its new Alexandroupolis FSRU in February. While US dominance over European LNG imports endures, Russia and Qatar are both still key supply sources, and Algerian LNG exports to Europe rose by some 22% year-on-year in 2023.

News

After two years of war, Europe emerging from shadow of Russian gas

Two years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- helping to trigger arguably the most serious gas crisis in Europe’s history -- market dynamics are much changed, with supply sources and routes majorly altered. With the majority of Russian pipeline deliveries halted, only a handful of countries still import piped gas from Russia’s Gazprom, among them Austria, Slovakia, Hungary and non-EU Serbia. And although Russian LNG supplies to Europe remain relatively robust, they still account for only a small share of Europe’s overall gas imports. Now, with the EU giving member states the right to restrict Russian imports at the national level and Austria looking to speed up an exit from Russian gas, the remaining Russian volumes in Europe face an uncertain future. The EU has already seen its Russian gas and LNG imports plummet, falling from 155 Bcm in 2021 to 80 Bcm in 2022 and to 43 Bcm last year, according to European Commission data. In its place, Europe is importing significantly more LNG, while traditional pipeline suppliers -- such as Norway, Algeria and Azerbaijan -- are doing their best to maintain high levels of exports. Norway’s pipeline exports to Europe hit a new record monthly high in December last year. EC efforts The EU’s energy commissioner Kadri Simson acknowledged Feb. 15 that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had created the worst energy crisis “in decades” for the EU. “But two years later, we can say that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s attempt to divide and blackmail us on energy has failed,” Simson said. The EC claims much of the success in responding to Russia’s weaponization of energy, upping its diplomatic efforts to secure alternative supplies, introducing mandatory storage filling and encouraging 15% demand reductions. In reality, market signals and the weather played as big a part in ensuring supply was able to meet demand through 2022, 2023 and into 2024. Related feature: Russia defiant two years into war reshaping global energy Prices rose sufficiently high through 2022 -- hitting new record levels in August that year -- to price out some demand, to attract increased LNG cargoes and to incentivize maxed out Norwegian supply. Mild winters in both 2022/23 and 2023/24 also meant gas stocks remained at historically high levels, keeping a lid on prices. On Feb. 23, Platts -- part of S&P Global Commodity Insights -- assessed the TTF front-month price at just Eur23.30/MWh, a far cry from its record high of almost Eur320/MWh in August 2022. But analysts are still cautious. “Two years on from the Russian invasion and benchmark prices are back to ‘normal’ levels. But we have not reached a new steady state,” according to Michael Stoppard, global Gas Strategy lead at S&P Global Commodity Insights. “While higher LNG imports from the US and elsewhere have covered for almost half of lost Russian pipeline gas, a bigger factor is sharply lower European demand,” Stoppard said. “Some gas demand has gone forever through factory closures or more efficient processes, but most will return. The market may be under-estimating how much demand will come back,” he said. Russian future Question marks also remain about whether Russian gas could regain its lost market share at some point in the future. Gas analyst Jonathan Stern from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies is doubtful. “The era of 30+% share of Russian gas is over and will not return, whatever the outcome of the war and whoever presides in the Kremlin,” Stern said. “Individual countries may continue to import gas from Russia, but Europe’s gas and energy map has changed fundamentally,” he said. Stern added that the major unresolved gas question concerned the remaining long-term Russian gas contracts with European buyers. These, he said, “cannot be wished away by politicians” and remain a legal and contractual “elephant in the room”. European gas traders, meanwhile, see consumption trends as key to the future of Russian gas in Europe. “It’s all about the demand -- if gas demand destruction continues we can avoid Russian gas,” a Switzerland-based trader said. A Netherlands-based trader said that with industrial demand being particularly price-sensitive, the loss of “cheap” Russian pipeline gas would continue to impact consumption. “The bottom line is that the need for gas comes from the price we get it at,” the trader said. Alternative options Russia itself has limited options for diverting its gas, with the majority of the volumes that used to be piped to Europe now thought to be shut in. Currently Russian pipeline gas to Europe is restricted to flows entering Ukraine at the Sudzha interconnection point and deliveries via the European string of TurkStream. A total of around 80 million cu m/d currently flows into Europe by pipeline, but half of this could be lost when Russia and Ukraine’s transit deal expires at the end of 2024. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said in January that Russia was ready to continue supplying gas to Europe via any available route, including through Ukraine. But, he said, Moscow had yet to see any desire from its counterparties for talks on the issue, while Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out engaging with Russia on talks over transit. Putin also repeated his claim in his interview with Tucker Carlson earlier this month that Russia was still ready to supply gas to Europe via the undamaged Nord Stream 2 string. However, the pipeline operator was never certified by the German authorities and so the line cannot flow gas. In the meantime, Gazprom is looking to raise exports to China and planning to lock in long-term supply deals with its Central Asian neighbors, such as Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. But these supplies would not be able to offset the lost European deliveries. And what seems certain in Europe is that -- at least at the political level -- there is very little desire to see Russian gas come back in any significant way to the market.